Failure to Address Psychosocial Needs and Prevent Harm from Hazardous Behaviors

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide effective and appropriate behavior management during care for a resident with significant mental health diagnoses and a history of PTSD. The resident was admitted with multiple psychiatric and neurological conditions, including schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, PTSD, panic disorder, psychosis, depression, dementia, and confusional arousals, along with physical conditions such as rhabdomyolysis, muscle weakness, chronic pain, hypertension, hypothermia, and a history of TIA. A PRN order for Olanzapine for agitation was in place, and the care plan identified that the resident could be confused and disoriented, required assistance with ADLs, and preferred showers. The plan of care also documented that the resident was non-compliant with care and treatments and experienced alterations in mood and behavior, including combative and verbally aggressive behaviors such as kicking, hitting, biting, and making false accusations. On the day of the incident, documentation showed that the resident became combative with staff and therapy during care and showering, cursing at staff and attempting to hit them with a closed fist. Redirection was attempted but was ineffective. Despite the resident’s agitation and combative behavior, staff proceeded with the shower and related care. Multiple staff members, including a PTA, COTA, CNA, and RN, were present in the room and shower area. Witness statements described the resident as verbally abusive, threatening to hurt staff if they hurt him, telling them to get out and leave him alone, and stating they were hurting him. Staff reported that these statements were made even before they physically assisted him with transfers. The resident attempted to bite and hit staff, and staff acknowledged that they did not stop care or leave the room to allow the resident time to calm down, even though they recognized that, for someone with PTSD, they would normally leave and re-approach. Staff interviews further revealed that the resident had been yelling, cursing, and swinging at staff, and that he did not like one of the male therapists, becoming more upset when he saw him. The CNA reported that the resident had been refusing to be cleaned, smelled strongly of urine, and had food on him, and that the RN had stated he had to be showered because of his condition and the need to change his bed and mattress. Staff confirmed that they continued with the shower and transfers despite the resident’s ongoing agitation and combative behavior, and that they never paused or left the room to de-escalate the situation. The DON verified there was no documentation in the progress notes of prior behavioral incidents before this date, despite staff describing the resident’s baseline as combative. These actions and omissions demonstrate that the facility did not implement effective, individualized behavior management interventions consistent with the resident’s mental health conditions, PTSD history, and care plan, leading to the cited deficiency. The incident culminated in the resident later alleging physical abuse and food withholding, although he could not provide details or identify an abuser. Staff present during the episode denied any abuse and described their actions as attempts to assist with necessary hygiene and transfers while the resident was verbally and physically aggressive. Nonetheless, the contemporaneous documentation and staff interviews show that the resident’s escalating agitation, threats, and combative behavior were met with continued, uninterrupted care and showering rather than the use of care-plan interventions such as decreasing stimulation, allowing the resident to vent with validation, determining triggers, or stepping away and re-approaching. The facility’s behavior management policy stated that behavior patterns interfering with functional capacity should be addressed to maximize dignity, independence, and self-determination, but the handling of this episode did not reflect effective application of that policy for this resident. Overall, the deficiency centers on the facility’s failure to provide appropriate behavioral and psychosocial interventions during a high-stress care interaction with a resident known to have serious mental disorders and PTSD. Staff recognized the resident’s baseline combative behavior and the need for special handling but did not adjust their approach during the incident, did not document prior behavioral patterns in the progress notes, and did not employ de-escalation strategies such as leaving the room and re-approaching. These documented actions and inactions during the shower and related care encounter form the basis of the cited failure to provide effective and appropriate behavior management services.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to adequately assess, monitor, document, and address a resident’s mental health decline and behavioral changes, despite the resident’s significant psychiatric history and hospice status. The resident had diagnoses including bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, epilepsy, COPD, and CKD, and was receiving hospice services. Antipsychotic medication (Abilify) had been gradually reduced from 10 mg to 5 mg on 11/11/25 and then to 2.5 mg on 12/11/25 as a gradual dose reduction. Psychology notes from 12/10/25 and 12/24/25 documented depression, low energy, poor concentration, and lack of motivation, but no psychosis, hallucinations, or suicidal ideation at those times. Behavior documentation from 12/07/25 through 01/02/26 showed no recorded behaviors, despite later staff reports of aggression and mood changes. On 12/22/25, nursing documentation noted low energy, inability to sleep, quiet and flat affect, and a behavior note described anhedonia and sadness. A PHQ-9 interview on 12/23/25 recorded no mood symptoms and indicated no need for a staff mood interview. On 12/24/25, psychology documented depressed affect, low energy, poor concentration, lack of interest, and sadness, but still no psychosis or suicidal ideation. On 12/30/25, a nursing progress note stated hospice was advised of increased aggression and that a PNP would adjust medications; however, there was no corresponding documentation of the resident’s aggression in the behavior charting, no record that the PNP actually saw the resident that day, and no evidence of any medication changes. A later interview with an RN clarified that the resident had been arguing with a roommate, refusing medications, and throwing things in his room, but these behaviors were not captured in the behavior documentation. During the night shift of 01/01/26–01/02/26, a CNA reported that the resident was “not right” and “actually scary,” lying in bed talking quietly to himself, shouting profanities when staff walked by, and becoming more agitated when approached, acting as if he would get out of bed. The CNA, who had cared for the resident for two to three years, stated this behavior was very out of character and reported her concerns to the LPN. The LPN attempted to give evening medications around 7:30 P.M., which the resident refused, and stated the door was kept open to observe him. The LPN later sent a text to the physician at 6:07 A.M. about the behaviors and lack of sleep but did not contact hospice as instructed by the DON and did not receive a response before leaving at 6:36 A.M. Behavior charting for 01/02/26 at 5:59 A.M. documented that the resident was verbally aggressive, yelling profanities, making threatening gestures, unapproachable, highly agitated, awake all night, and talking loudly with aggressive, profane language to himself; it also stated that the physician and on-call provider were notified, but there was no evidence of interventions implemented throughout the night. On the morning of 01/02/26, the DON reported receiving a call around 6:00 A.M. from the hall nurse about the resident talking to himself and to people who were not there and instructed the nurse to call hospice. The DON arrived at approximately 7:00 A.M., was told the resident was sleeping, and did not check on him. Hospice later confirmed the facility did not contact them about the change in mental status and that hospice only became aware when their nurse arrived for a routine visit and saw EMS assisting the resident. Around 7:50 A.M., a transportation driver arriving at the facility saw something in the snow and discovered the resident outside approximately 100 feet from his window, on his knees in the snow, agitated, stating he wanted to die, with abrasions, bright red skin, and wearing only light clothing. Facility staff and EMS reports indicated the resident was combative, aggressive, and psychotic, with altered mental status, injuries, and signs of hypothermia in temperatures around 21°F. EMS and hospital records documented that the resident was found kneeling in the snow with a cold wet blanket, with drag marks suggesting he had rolled down a hill from a first-floor window approximately 77 inches above the ground. The resident was pale with purple extremities, abrasions, and nonblanchable skin over heels and knees, and required soft restraints and sedative medication due to combative behavior. At the hospital, he was described as cold to the touch, with a core temperature of 95.6°F, delusions (including stating he was pregnant), and paranoia. He was admitted with hypothermia due to exposure, stage one frostbite to the heels, and delusions, and was placed on an Emergency Application for suspected suicide attempt after reportedly jumping from his window and remaining in the snow. Interviews with the PNP and hospice staff revealed discrepancies in Abilify dosing between hospice and facility records, lack of timely psychiatric reassessment after the GDR, and inconsistent or missing documentation of behavioral concerns. The facility’s Administrator and Vice President of Clinical Operations confirmed there was no facility policy related to meeting residents’ behavioral or psychological needs, and the facility’s change-in-condition policy required physician consultation for significant changes in mental or psychosocial status, which was not consistently followed in this case.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with a documented history of trauma and a preference for female caregivers was provided incontinence care by two male staff members, despite clear care plan interventions specifying the resident's wishes. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment, dementia, depression, anxiety, and a history of trauma involving males, was observed on video objecting to the care, verbally refusing, and expressing distress during the incident. The care plan, which was last updated to reflect the resident's trauma history and preference for female caregivers during showers and checks/changes, was not followed during this event. Medical records and interviews confirmed that the resident's family had communicated the preference for female caregivers upon admission, and this was initially accommodated. However, after the resident was moved between floors, male caregivers resumed providing care without documented objection from the family until the incident in question. On the day of the incident, the resident was resistive to care, repeatedly said "no," and expressed that her hand was being hurt while the two male caregivers continued with incontinence care. A female RN eventually completed the care after the male staff left the room. Subsequent assessments and review of photos revealed bruising and discoloration on the resident's hands and arms, though the facility attributed some of these marks to previous lab draws and a fall. The facility's own policy required person-centered care that maximizes dignity, autonomy, and choice, but the actions taken did not align with these standards. The DON confirmed that the care plan should have been followed and that care should have been paused and resumed later if the resident refused.

Penalty

No penalty information released

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide necessary social services to support the mental health and psychosocial well-being of residents following traumatic incidents. Three residents with varying diagnoses, including depressive disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, and anxiety disorders, experienced incidents such as alleged abuse, unexplained bruising, and theft of personal property. Despite these events, there was no documentation of counseling or follow-up psychosocial services in the social service notes for any of the affected residents during the periods following the incidents. Interviews with the residents confirmed that none had been visited by staff or offered counseling services after their respective incidents, and each expressed ongoing distress or feelings of violation. The Social Service Designee acknowledged that residents should be assessed and offered psychosocial support after such occurrences, but verified that no such visits or assessments had taken place. Facility policy required notification of the social service department after incidents to ensure psychosocial needs were addressed, but this procedure was not followed for the residents involved.

Penalty

Fine: $231,730

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a resident diagnosed with depression, bipolar disorder, PTSD, and anxiety disorder. The resident, who was admitted following a craniotomy for meningioma, had physician's orders for antidepressant and antianxiety medications. Despite a Minimum Data Set assessment indicating severe depression, the physician progress notes did not address the resident's depression. The resident expressed a desire to see her psychiatrist and psychologist, but there was no evidence of follow-up to schedule these appointments. Interviews with facility staff confirmed the resident's severe depression and her request for mental health services. The resident, who has a history of trauma and prefers not to have male caregivers, had not seen a mental health professional since admission. The plan of care included an intervention to arrange services from a Licensed Mental Health Provider, but this was not implemented, leading to the deficiency in providing necessary mental health support for the resident.

Penalty

Fine: $26,685

The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, individualized, and effective interventions to meet the behavioral health care needs of a resident with significant psychiatric history. The resident, who had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, dementia, anxiety, antisocial personality disorder, hallucinations, body dysmorphic disorder, and a history of suicide attempts, was found unresponsive in a communal shower room due to a self-inflicted injury. This incident occurred after an LPN provided the resident with a pair of scissors to cut his hair, without reviewing the resident's care plan or providing supervision. The resident's care plan included supervision while shaving and noted a history of self-harm and suicidal ideations. Despite this, the LPN did not check the resident's care plan or Kardex before giving the scissors, which were described as safety scissors with a rounded blunted end. The resident was left unsupervised with the scissors, leading to a self-inflicted injury that resulted in significant blood loss and ultimately, the resident's death. Interviews with staff revealed that there was no indication or concern that the resident was suicidal at the time, and no behaviors or statements suggested self-harm intentions. However, the facility lacked a policy addressing suicidal behavior, residents at risk for self-harm, or sharp object safety, which contributed to the incident. The root cause analysis concluded that the incident was due to the LPN providing the resident with a sharp object, which should not have occurred.

Removal Plan

• Resident #93 was noted with acute blood loss, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was notified, and Resident #93 was transported to a local emergency room (ER) by local EMS providers.
• LPN #500 was immediately provided 1:1 verbal education by the DON on not providing sharp objects to residents.
• LPN #500 was suspended by the Administrator following the incident, pending a thorough investigation. LPN #500 was permitted to return to work.
• The Director of Nursing (DON), ADON #270, Unit Manager #267, Housekeeping Supervisor #283, Human Resource Manager #262, Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #246, Central Supply #317 and Admissions Director #216 completed a whole house sweep for sharp objects with no sharp objects noted.
• All residents were assessed, and medical records were reviewed (including psychiatric/provider notes) to identify those residents who had self-harm and/or suicidal ideation history. In addition, those who could be, were interviewed, related to suicidal ideation/self-harm. Eleven residents (#100, #15, #16, #28, #33, #38, #40, #101, #57, #61, and #102) were identified as at risk for self-harming behaviors. Care plans and associated Kardex's were reviewed by Regional Clinical Support Nurse #244.
• All staff were interviewed regarding any knowledge of residents exhibiting any signs, symptoms, or behaviors which could be indicative of suicidal ideations. This was completed by the Administrator.
• Regional Clinical Support Nurse #244 educated all facility interdisciplinary team members (IDT) on updating care plans for resident(s) who have suicide ideations/self-harm and pulling them to the Kardex.
• All staff were educated by the DON/Designee on reviewing residents' Kardex, ensuring residents were free and safe from self-harm, and assisting and providing supervision to residents as deemed necessary.
• The Administrator completed a quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) and a root cause analysis with the Medical Director, DON, ADON #270, Regional Clinical Support Nurse #244, Medical Records #317, Human Resources Manager #262 and LSW# 246. The facility root cause analysis identified the nurse (LPN #500) gave Resident #93 a sharp object and should not have. The facility corrective action plan involved mitigating the risk and availability of sharp objects and identifying those residents at risk for self-harm or suicidal ideations.
• The DON/Designee began random, ongoing resident audits on care plans for residents with a history of suicidal ideations and/or self-harm. The ongoing audits were completed four times weekly for a total of six weeks.
• The DON/Designee began random, ongoing audits of staff competencies regarding staff utilization of the resident Kardex's. The audit reviewed five random staff members four times weekly for a total of four weeks.
• The Administrator held a QAPI meeting with the DON, ADON, Medical Director, Activities Director #201, Medical Records Coordinator #317, Human Resource Manager #262, Regional Clinical Support Nurse #244 and LSW# 246 to discuss the findings of the facility audits.